Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump & performance degradation

From: brianb-pggeneral(at)edsamail(dot)com
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump & performance degradation
Date: 2000-08-01 05:36:58
Message-ID: 20000801053658.2876.qmail@mail01.edsamail.com.ph (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Don Baccus writes:

> At 01:06 PM 8/1/00 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
> 
> >I agree; it's definitely a non-critical feature. But then, it is only 80
> >lines of code in one place (including 28 non-code lines). I am not totally
> >happy with the results it produces, so I have no objection to removing it
> >all. I just need some more general feedback...
> 
> Have you tried pg_dump on a multi-processor machine, which most serious
> database-backed websites run on these days?   Do you see the same performance
> degradation?  My site runs on a dual P450 with RAID 1 LVD disks, and cost
> me exactly $2100 to build (would've been less if I'd laid off the extra
> cooling fans!)

Hi Don. 

I'm the one having the problem. The machine in question is a 4-CPU Xeon
with 4GB RAM running Linux and Postgres6.5. It's not a web application
(although AOLserver is running on the same machine). The table has more
than 10 million rows, but I don't know exactly how many.

In any case, I tried Philip's throttle code, ported to pg_dump for 6.5 but
it doesn't seem to help. It seems that the backend doing the COPY is taking
up all the I/O. If there's no way around that I will probably just have to
schedule a couple of hours of downtime to dump the data.

I would like to extend my thanks to Philip and everyone else for their help
and suggestions.

Brian
--
Brian Baquiran <brianb(at)edsamail(dot)com>
http://www.baquiran.com/  AIM: bbaquiran 
Work: +63(2)7182222       Home: +63(2) 9227123

I'm smarter than average. Therefore, average, to me, seems kind of stupid. 
People weren't purposely being stupid. It just came naturally.
                              -- Bruce "Tog" Toganazzini

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-08-01 06:35:20
Subject: Re: RPMs built for Mandrake
Previous:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2000-08-01 04:56:51
Subject: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Thomas SwanDate: 2000-08-01 06:49:44
Subject: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation
Previous:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2000-08-01 04:56:51
Subject: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group