Re: DateTime fields

From: Ted Nolan SRI Augusta GA <ted(at)ags(dot)ga(dot)erg(dot)sri(dot)com>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dale Anderson <danderso(at)crystalsugar(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, ted(at)ags(dot)ga(dot)erg(dot)sri(dot)com
Subject: Re: DateTime fields
Date: 2000-06-28 16:25:32
Message-ID: 200006281625.MAA00858@ags.ga.erg.sri.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In message <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)3(dot)96(dot)1000627094243(dot)5765A-100000(at)ara(dot)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>you write:
>
>On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Dale Anderson" <danderso(at)crystalsugar(dot)com> writes:
>> > I noticed that the DateTime fields and the to_timestamp function
>> > interpret 12 PM as 00:00 and 12 AM as 12:00.
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>> Looks fine to me.
>
>No, you overlook "to_timestamp()" in query. This routine really has bug in
>PM/AM interpretation.
>
> Karel
>

Just wanted to point out that there was a court case (involving "no
parking" signs with confusing hours) several years ago that established
that, for at least parts of the US, 12 Noon is legally neither AM nor
PM. This actually makes logical sense as well,

AM is "ante meridiem", ie "before noon"

and
PM is "post meridiem", ie "after noon"

so noon itself can be neither.

Ted Nolan

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arthur M. Kang 2000-06-28 16:32:29 Lingering Backend Processes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-28 16:20:44 Re: Trigger (C) question