| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-15 21:48:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200006152148.RAA27790@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> I've also mentioned many times neither relname nor oid is sufficient
> for the uniqueness. In addiiton neither relname nor oid would be
> necessary for the uniqueness.
> IMHO,it's bad to rely on the item which is neither necessary nor
> sufficient.
> I proposed relname+unique_id naming once. The unique_id is
> independent from oid. The relname is only for convinience for
> DBA and so we don't have to change it due to RENAME.
> Db's consistency is much more important than dba's satis-
> faction.
>
> Comments ?
I am happy not to rename the file on 'RENAME', but seems no one likes
that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-06-15 22:08:16 | Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-06-15 21:48:21 | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-06-15 22:53:59 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-06-15 21:48:21 | RE: Big 7.1 open items |