Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Date: 2000-06-12 15:58:28
Message-ID: 200006121558.LAA19769@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> 
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > 
> > > Well, we clearly need ability to prevent table creation, and lock
> > > control is good too.  Seems useful.
> > 
> > Lock control needs to be per table, not user. Creation control needs to be
> > per database (eventually schema), not user.
> > 
> 
>  We already tell about it, but yes, you are right too. But it is not 
> implemented yet.
> 

I am inclined to think it helps to have this configurable at the user
level too, but let's see what people come up with.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Denis PerchineDate: 2000-06-12 16:00:29
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-06-12 15:50:53
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group