> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> We may have documented the behavior, but that doesn't make it right ;-)
> >> If someone were to submit a patch to change MOVE 0 into a no-op
> >> (without breaking MOVE ALL of course), I'd vote to apply it.
> > If we do that, how does one move to the end of a cursor?
> MOVE ALL.
> The problem right now is just that MOVE ALL is internally represented
> as MOVE 0 ... there needs to be a different representation for it.
> regards, tom lane
Added to TODO:
* MOVE 0 should not move to end of cursor
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: GANESH KUMAR||Date: 2000-06-12 14:11:30|
|Subject: foregein key|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-06-11 05:01:00|
|Subject: Re: Bug in move 0 |