| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, jutso(at)tpts5(dot)seed(dot)net(dot)tw, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in move 0 |
| Date: | 2000-06-12 01:11:37 |
| Message-ID: | 200006120111.VAA11787@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> We may have documented the behavior, but that doesn't make it right ;-)
> >> If someone were to submit a patch to change MOVE 0 into a no-op
> >> (without breaking MOVE ALL of course), I'd vote to apply it.
>
> > If we do that, how does one move to the end of a cursor?
>
> MOVE ALL.
>
> The problem right now is just that MOVE ALL is internally represented
> as MOVE 0 ... there needs to be a different representation for it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Added to TODO:
* MOVE 0 should not move to end of cursor
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | GANESH KUMAR | 2000-06-12 14:11:30 | foregein key |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-11 05:01:00 | Re: Bug in move 0 |