Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Using substr with user defined types

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using substr with user defined types
Date: 2000-05-18 15:20:05
Message-ID: 200005181520.LAA19064@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql
> I'd like to see "opaque" eliminated from Postgres, because it's
> unhelpfully named and is used to cover several distinct purposes that
> would be better served with distinct names.  Might create too much of
> a backwards compatibility problem though :-(

I was just thinking about that last night in relation to my book. 
Opaque is a weird name.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-05-18 15:28:37
Subject: Re: Re[2]: lower() for varchar data by creating an index
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-05-18 15:00:47
Subject: Re: Re[2]: lower() for varchar data by creating an index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group