Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Mount (Home)" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: 2000-05-02 17:37:43
Message-ID: 200005021737.NAA22705@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now
> >> work with 7.0?  If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver
> >> is probably better even if it has lurking bugs.  If the answer is
> >> "pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got.
> 
> > As far as I know, no one has it yet, except Thomas.  The driver must
> > have a domain of org.postgresql or it is the old version.  Only since I
> > installed Peter's Makefile last week did it become install-able.
> 
> So the version currently in CVS has seen hardly any testing either?
> Man, you really know how to make a guy feel comfortable :-(

Up to then, it was using the code in postgresql.  Now it is using
org/postgresql directory, and they are different.  postgresql is the
6.5.* driver, and org/postgresql is the 7.0 driver.

> Given that, we might as well let Peter have the extra day or two
> to bring the CVS version to the best state he can.

Yea, it had that effect on me too.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joachim AchtzehnterDate: 2000-05-02 18:53:17
Subject: Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-05-02 17:27:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2000-05-02 18:05:37
Subject: Re: Change the table in a DELETE statement in ECPG
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-05-02 17:27:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group