> Today, in a message to Thomas Lockhart, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > I am unable to compile the java code with kaffe. Can anyone compile
> > > > jdbc under 7.0?
> > However, it seems kaffe can't compile self-referencing java files. I
> > don't know enough about java to know that is a problem or not.
> Have not tried with 7.0, but recent versions of Kaffe were definitely able
> to compile the JDBC code that came with 6.5.3, but only after modifying
> the version check in the makeVersion.java file in src/interfaces/jdbc (and
> perhaps elsewhere where a versioon check occurs). The code checks for the
> java version string and rejects everything that doesn't start with either
> 1.1 or 1.2. The problem was that Kaffe reports its own version, e.g. 1.02,
> rather than the corresponding JDK version.
Interesting. It does compile under kaffe 1.05, but the mutually
dependent java files cause a compile error. Seems 6.5.3 had the same
problem, so I am not sure why it would have worked then.
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2000-05-02 10:55:53|
|Subject: Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2000-05-02 10:54:01|
|Subject: Re: Update to FAQ_SCO.|
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2000-05-02 11:01:04|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status|
|Previous:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2000-05-02 09:24:07|
|Subject: Re: NOTICE: BeginTransactionBlock and not in default|