Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-04-11 14:27:54
Message-ID: 200004111427.KAA13130@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> > Considering that there is up to this day no terminally universal way to
> > pronounce 'Linux' (unless you know Swedish :), I don't think that's worth
> > worrying about. Personally, I find PostgreSQL very pronouncable though.
> 
> Me too: Post-Gres-Q-L .. 

Added to first FAQ item.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-04-11 14:31:12
Subject: Re: Updated docs needed for 7.0
Previous:From: Vince VielhaberDate: 2000-04-11 13:52:49
Subject: Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group