Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-04-11 14:27:54
Message-ID: 200004111427.KAA13130@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Considering that there is up to this day no terminally universal way to
> > pronounce 'Linux' (unless you know Swedish :), I don't think that's worth
> > worrying about. Personally, I find PostgreSQL very pronouncable though.
>
> Me too: Post-Gres-Q-L ..

Added to first FAQ item.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-04-11 14:31:12 Re: Updated docs needed for 7.0
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-04-11 13:52:49 Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL