On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 01:45:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Offhand, if you do not put -I into your compile switches, I'd be
> somewhat surprised that either way would work for you. Certainly
> hardcoding a full path into application source code is a completely
> unportable way to do things...
Not when it's autoconf that does the hardcoding :-)
With the number of external librairies we use, the amount of -I was
becoming a bit too high for our tastes...
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-04-10 19:15:58|
|Subject: Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 |
|Previous:||From: Didier Verna||Date: 2000-04-10 18:07:05|
|Subject: Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3|