Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3

From: Olivier Galibert <galibert(at)xemacs(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Didier Verna <didier(at)xemacs(dot)org>, bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, XEmacs beta testers <xemacs-beta(at)xemacs(dot)org>, Oliver Elphick <Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3
Date: 2000-04-10 18:22:39
Message-ID: 20000410142239.A1682@nemesis.ncsl.nist.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 01:45:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Offhand, if you do not put -I into your compile switches, I'd be
> somewhat surprised that either way would work for you.  Certainly
> hardcoding a full path into application source code is a completely
> unportable way to do things...

Not when it's autoconf that does the hardcoding :-)

With the number of external librairies we use, the amount of -I was
becoming a bit too high for our tastes...

  OG.

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-04-10 19:15:58
Subject: Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3
Previous:From: Didier VernaDate: 2000-04-10 18:07:05
Subject: Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group