Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.1 items

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.1 items
Date: 2000-04-06 16:00:08
Message-ID: 200004061600.MAA21583@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > >>>> WAL/write ahead log
> > >>>> TOAST/long tuples
> > >>>> outer joins
> > >>>> query tree redesign
> > >>>> function manager redesign
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> What year to we want to release 7.1?  :-)
> > 
> > >  If all will right (and major developers will agree) I plan PREPARE/EXECUTE
> > > commands and changes in SPI background for plan saving (query cache).
> > 
> > Given that there is going to be a querytree redesign for 7.1, I'd
> > suggest holding off on prepared plans until 7.2.  Otherwise it's
> > going to be a mess.
> 
> Any chance for dirty read? Waiting for transaction end on inserts with
> duplicates on unique keys in transactions can be a lot of fun.

But we have committed read with no block.  Why would you want dirty
read.  Chapter 10 of my book is about transactions and locking.  Of
course, I may be missing something here.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Karel ZakDate: 2000-04-06 16:02:27
Subject: Re: 7.1 items
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-04-06 15:58:53
Subject: Temporary indexes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group