> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am doing the chapter on temporary tables.  Should I show examples
> > using TEMP or TEMPORARY?
> 
> TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not.  Nuff said...

OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

• Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY at 2000-04-06 15:31:40 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY at 2000-04-06 16:45:39 from Thomas Lockhart
• Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY at 2000-04-06 17:11:54 from Don Baccus

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2000-04-06 15:58:53
	Subject: Temporary indexes
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2000-04-06 15:31:40
	Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY