Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Date: 2000-04-06 15:38:10
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am doing the chapter on temporary tables.  Should I show examples
> > using TEMP or TEMPORARY?
> TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not.  Nuff said...

OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-04-06 15:58:53
Subject: Temporary indexes
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-04-06 15:31:40
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group