Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BIT datatype (Fixed)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BIT datatype (Fixed)
Date: 2000-04-03 20:49:11
Message-ID: 200004032049.QAA17339@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Applied.

> Hi,
> 
>     here is an updated version of the bit type with a bugfix and all the necessary
> SQL functions defined. This should replace what is currently in contrib. I'd
> appreciate any comments on what is there.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Adriaan

[Attachment, skipping...]


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2000-04-03 21:07:53
Subject: Re: procedure returns a tuple
Previous:From: Alfred PerlsteinDate: 2000-04-03 19:32:51
Subject: Re: Should pg_dump refuse to run if DB has different version?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group