On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 02:29:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. Since there have been examples of vacuum analyze <tablename> in
> the numeric regress test since 6.5, I'd think we'd have heard about it
> if there were any widespread problem ;-). Perhaps it is a platform
> issue, but I suspect you will find there are additional constraints that
> explain why no one but you is seeing it. Please do dig into it ... or,
> if you do not have time, you could consider giving one of the other
> developers a login on your machine and that person could check it out.
Story so far: I have a table called "found". vacuum() in src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
gets called with vacrel="found". During vc_init() at line 177, vacrel is cleared (="").
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-03-08 19:29:36|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql |
|Previous:||From: Ed Loehr||Date: 2000-03-08 17:19:18|
|Subject: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling|