Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Date: 2000-03-08 01:48:51
Message-ID: 200003080148.UAA07482@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I tried it and the ABORT worked, so I have no idea now what is happening
> > here.
> 
> Is the table file still there after the ABORT?  If not, it won't work
> for long...

Oh, well.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-08 01:50:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-08 01:44:21
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group