Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme
Date: 2000-03-07 03:31:56
Message-ID: 200003070331.WAA03864@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I have (almost) nothing to do for about 3 weeks, so I thought I'd get
> started on some stuff for next time around.

    Lucky you

> The idea here is to unify all the various configuration settings into one
> coherent scheme. This would include:
>
> [...]
> 
> Let me know what you think. Don't be rushed if you have other things to do
> right now.

    Sounds good to me.


Jan from Philly

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ross J. ReedstromDate: 2000-03-07 05:04:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2000-03-07 01:34:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group