Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1
Date: 2000-02-24 16:33:30
Message-ID: 200002241633.LAA27384@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Applied.

> Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > - It fails to reload datetime indexes, because of "DefineIndex: datetime_ops
> > class not found".
> 
> Oops.  Comparing 6.5 and current pg_opclass contents, I see we are going
> to have this trouble with timespan_ops and oid8_ops as well as with
> datetime_ops (although very likely there are no user tables with indexes
> on oid8?  Not certain though).
> 
> Bruce, do you want to hack the parser to drop these opclass names the
> same way it's dropping network_ops?  Or do we need to adopt a cleaner
> solution?
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ************
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-02-24 16:34:18
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS
Previous:From: Post MessageDate: 2000-02-24 16:32:00
Subject: Solid time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group