| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dirk Lutzebaeck <lutzeb(at)aeccom(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) |
| Date: | 2000-01-05 17:46:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200001051746.MAA26430@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > I have applied the attached patch to the REL6_5 branch. (There is
> > already similar code in the current branch.) I'm afraid it won't
> > help you recover from an already-corrupted pg_statistic table, though.
>
> How can I recover from this? Simply delete the entries in pg_statistic?
> Is this possible?
The only fix I know is pg_upgrade. You may have to enable the script.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl DeBisschop | 2000-01-06 15:35:13 | Re: [BUGS] problem creating index in 6,5,3 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-05 14:38:50 | Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) |