Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Problem is that a polymorphic SRF cannot (currently at least) both
> accept and return type anyarray.
Beyond that, would the proposed function really be SQL-compliant other
than this one point? I had the idea that UNNEST required some
fundamental changes (but I might be confusing it with something else).
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2004-11-29 18:30:27|
|Subject: Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Hallgren||Date: 2004-11-29 17:50:17|
|Subject: Re: Status of server side Large Object support?|