Re: 8.2beta1 (w32): server process crash (tsvector)

yeah... i dont think it will be related to index anyway.
it looks to me that some extra bytes are written to the allocated
memory when locale is set to en-US etc. The warning

"WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C6D0F8"

is generated when you write bytes on a location more than its allocated size,
and this thing will eventualy lead to a server crash.

Now, I would suggest try to minimize the script and look for the action
with leads to this warning. Then a debug would be easy on the execution
path and I guess, there won't be any problem in parsing and planning.

Can you send me the knotty script BTW?

--Imad
www.EnterpriseDB.com

On 11/12/06, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> wrote:
> Ok, I've run this test on an assert enabled build (my msvc build,
> actually, so I could get a debugger on it if needed). It then outputs:
>
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C6D0F8
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C6AEA0
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C6B200
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C44630
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C4C118
> WARNING: problem in alloc set ExprContext: bogus aset link in block
> 02C435A8, c
> hunk 02C44520
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C66440
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C3B9D0
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C3BDE8
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C4E7E0
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C47508
> WARNING: problem in alloc set ExprContext: bogus aset link in block
> 02C435A8, c
> hunk 02C47528
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C43800
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C66C90
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C68270
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C4F5D8
> WARNING: problem in alloc set ExprContext: bogus aset link in block
> 02C4E6F8, c
> hunk 02C4F5F8
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C7B680
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C45190
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C46AC8
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C3C538
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C67B90
> WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 02C438F0
> WARNING: problem in alloc set ExprContext: bad single-chunk 02C43FB8 in
> block 0
> 2C435A8
> WARNING: problem in alloc set ExprContext: bogus aset link in block
> 02C435A8, c
> hunk 02C43FB8
> server closed the connection unexpectedly
> This probably means the server terminated abnormally
> before or while processing the request.
>
>
>
>
> The actual crash happens on line 1142 of AllocSetCheck. Full callstack
> is:
> > postgres.exe!AllocSetCheck(MemoryContextData *
> context=0x02c455b8) Line 1142 + 0x11 bytes C
> postgres.exe!AllocSetReset(MemoryContextData *
> context=0x02c455b8) Line 409 + 0x9 bytes C
> postgres.exe!MemoryContextReset(MemoryContextData *
> context=0x02c455b8) Line 129 + 0xf bytes C
> postgres.exe!ExecScan(ScanState * node=0x02c227d0,
> TupleTableSlot * (ScanState *)* accessMtd=0x00530b70) Line 91 + 0xc
> bytes C
> postgres.exe!ExecSeqScan(ScanState * node=0x02c227d0) Line 130
> + 0xe bytes C
> postgres.exe!ExecProcNode(PlanState * node=0x02c227d0) Line 349
> + 0x9 bytes C
> postgres.exe!ExecutePlan(EState * estate=0x02c223e8, PlanState *
> planstate=0x02c227d0, CmdType operation=CMD_UPDATE, long numberTuples=0,
> ScanDirection direction=ForwardScanDirection, _DestReceiver *
> dest=0x02bf8d30) Line 1081 + 0x9 bytes C
> postgres.exe!ExecutorRun(QueryDesc * queryDesc=0x02c44078,
> ScanDirection direction=ForwardScanDirection, long count=0) Line 246 +
> 0x20 bytes C
> postgres.exe!ProcessQuery(Query * parsetree=0x02bddab0, Plan *
> plan=0x02bf7e28, ParamListInfoData * params=0x00000000, _DestReceiver *
> dest=0x02bf8d30, char * completionTag=0x00d4fb24) Line 157 + 0xd bytes
> C
> postgres.exe!PortalRunMulti(PortalData * portal=0x02c48138,
> _DestReceiver * dest=0x02bf8d30, _DestReceiver * altdest=0x02bf8d30,
> char * completionTag=0x00d4fb24) Line 1148 + 0x1c bytes C
> postgres.exe!PortalRun(PortalData * portal=0x02c48138, long
> count=2147483647, _DestReceiver * dest=0x02bf8d30, _DestReceiver *
> altdest=0x02bf8d30, char * completionTag=0x00d4fb24) Line 700 + 0x15
> bytes C
> postgres.exe!exec_simple_query(const char *
> query_string=0x02bdd4c8) Line 943 + 0x23 bytes C
> postgres.exe!PostgresMain(int argc=4, char * * argv=0x02ba2478,
> const char * username=0x025e7af8) Line 3414 + 0xc bytes C
> postgres.exe!BackendRun(Port * port=0x00d4fd2c) Line 2853 +
> 0x17 bytes C
> postgres.exe!SubPostmasterMain(int argc=3, char * *
> argv=0x025e5b30) Line 3288 + 0xc bytes C
> postgres.exe!main(int argc=3, char * * argv=0x025e5b30) Line
> 165 + 0xd bytes C
>
>
>
>
> Can someone point me towards what next to check? :-)
>
> Oh, and per Thomas, this does NOT appear to happen in C locale, but
> happens in both de_CH and en_US. ANd I've tested in Swedish_Sweden,
> which also crashes.
>
> Note that this appears not to be index related at all, because during
> this test there is only a standard btree index on "someint", and nothing
> on the tsvector column.
>
> //Magnus
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-bugs-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Thomas H.
> > Sent: den 12 november 2006 15:06
> > To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [BUGS] 8.2beta1 (w32): server process crash (tsvector)
> >
> > this bug (please see below) is unfortunately still present in
> > beta3 (win32 build). test case still crashes the child
> > process and lets postmaster kill & reload everything.
> >
> > it is not GiST-related, i've just validated the same problem
> > using GIN.
> >
> > this breaks tsearch2 functionality on our win32 system as no
> > tsvector-indexing of new/existing rows is possible (crash
> > after ~10 processed rows). searching already indexed rows works fine.
> >
> > best regards,
> > thomas
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <me(at)alternize(dot)com>
> > To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: [BUGS] 8.2beta1 (w32): server process crash (tsvector)
> >
> >
> > >>> the following query will crash the server process:
> > >>> INSERT INTO news.news
> > >>> SELECT * FROM news.news2;
> > >>
> > >> This is undoubtedly data-dependent. Can you supply some
> > sample data
> > >> that makes it happen?
> > >
> > > it's not only happening with INSERTS, but also updates. as
> > thats easier to
> > > test, here's how i can reproduce the error:
> > >
> > > 1. create new database (encoding: UTF8) with tsearch2 on
> > 8.2b1 win32
> > > (system
> > > locale: de_CH.1252)
> > > 2. insert the data from the zip file
> > > [http://alternize.com/pgsql/tsearch2test.zip] (be sure to
> > also update
> > > pg_ts_cf /
> > > pg_ts_cfgmap as we have WIN1252 locale)
> > > 3. execute UPDATE test SET idxFTI = to_tsvector('default',
> > "sometext"); or
> > > similar queries
> > > 4. hopefully see the process crashing as i do ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: server process (PID 4584) exited with exit
> > > code -1073741819
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: terminating any other active
> > server processes
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 WARNING: terminating connection
> > because of crash of
> > > another server process
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 DETAIL: The postmaster has commanded
> > this server
> > > process to roll back the current transaction and exit,
> > because another
> > > server process exited abnormally and possibly corrupted
> > shared memory.
> > > {snipp}
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: all server processes terminated;
> > reinitializing
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: database system was interrupted
> > at 2006-10-17
> > > 17:23:41 W. Europe Daylight Time
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: Windows
> > fopen("recovery.conf","r") failed: code
> > > 2,
> > > errno 2
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: Windows
> > fopen("pg_xlog/00000001.history","r")
> > > failed: code 2, errno 2
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: Windows fopen("backup_label","r")
> > failed: code
> > > 2,
> > > errno 2
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/E2ECA728
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: redo record is at 0/E2ECA728;
> > undo record is at
> > > 0/0; shutdown FALSE
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: next transaction ID: 0/514299;
> > next OID: 6276957
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: next MultiXactId: 1; next
> > MultiXactOffset: 0
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: database system was not properly
> > shut down;
> > > automatic recovery in progress
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: redo starts at 0/E2ECA778
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: unexpected pageaddr 0/DB0CC000 in
> > log file 0,
> > > segment 227, offset 835584
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:44 LOG: redo done at 0/E30CBE78
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:45 LOG: database system is ready
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:45 LOG: Windows fopen("global/pg_fsm.cache","rb")
> > > failed:
> > > code 2, errno 2
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:45 LOG: transaction ID wrap limit is
> > 2147484172, limited
> > > by database "postgres"
> > > 2006-10-17 17:23:45 LOG: Windows
> > fopen("global/pgstat.stat","rb") failed:
> > > code 2, errno 2
> > >
> > >
> > > i've also tried to update each record on its own in a
> > for-loop. here the
> > > crash happens as well, sometimes after 10 updates,
> > sometimes after 100
> > > updates, sometimes even after 1 update. but eventually
> > every record can be
> > > updated. so i do not think its entierly content-related...
> > >
> > > for what its worth, here's the output of pg_controldata:
> > >
> > > pg_control version number: 822
> > > Catalog version number: 200609181
> > > Database system identifier: 4986650172201464825
> > > Database cluster state: in production
> > > pg_control last modified: 17.10.2006 17:44:29
> > > Current log file ID: 0
> > > Next log file segment: 230
> > > Latest checkpoint location: 0/E4E0F978
> > > Prior checkpoint location: 0/E46BF420
> > > Latest checkpoint's REDO location: 0/E4E03098
> > > Latest checkpoint's UNDO location: 0/0
> > > Latest checkpoint's TimeLineID: 1
> > > Latest checkpoint's NextXID: 0/531333
> > > Latest checkpoint's NextOID: 6285149
> > > Latest checkpoint's NextMultiXactId: 1
> > > Latest checkpoint's NextMultiOffset: 0
> > > Time of latest checkpoint: 17.10.2006 17:43:45
> > > Minimum recovery ending location: 0/0
> > > Maximum data alignment: 8
> > > Database block size: 8192
> > > Blocks per segment of large relation: 131072
> > > WAL block size: 8192
> > > Bytes per WAL segment: 16777216
> > > Maximum length of identifiers: 64
> > > Maximum columns in an index: 32
> > > Date/time type storage: floating-point numbers
> > > Maximum length of locale name: 128
> > > LC_COLLATE: German_Switzerland.1252
> > > LC_CTYPE: German_Switzerland.1252
> > >
> > > let me know if more information / data is needed.
> > >
> > > on a sidenote: are those fopen() errors
> > debug-code-leftovers or something
> > > one should worry about? i can't find those files on the file system.
> > >
> > > - thomas
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> > >
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
> >
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>