Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.4 open items list

From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.4 open items list
Date: 2009-03-27 10:21:04
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10903270321j331bb098mf35c5ba096339534@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we should also boot everything in the "pre-existing bugs"
> category, and the first two items from the "questions" category, which
> don't seem important enough to worry about at this stage of the game.
> That would leave us with 14 items, all of which look reasonably
> relevant and 8.4-related.
>
> Comments?

FWIW, I posted my comments in the wiki. I tried to post useful
information about the status of each item I have an opinion about.

-- 
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew GierthDate: 2009-03-27 10:45:27
Subject: Re: Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql?
Previous:From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2009-03-27 09:57:44
Subject: Re: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group