Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues

From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Date: 2009-03-22 22:15:30
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10903221515k44346c3xf7bc6b9c382e6adc@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> There might (or might not) be some use-case
> for being able to declare that module A depends on module B,

Typically, earthdistance requires cube so the module dependency is
already something that might be useful. But as you said, it doesn't
require a second level of grouping, just a way to define dependencies.

-- 
Guillaume

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-03-22 22:42:11
Subject: Re: Broken stuff in new dtrace probes
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-03-22 21:46:20
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group