On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hm. People have complained of that fact from time to time in normal
> usage as well. Should we simply change SIGINT handling to allow it to
> cancel an idle transaction?
If this means that we would be able to able to easily rollback the
current transaction of a backend stuck in "idle in transaction"
status, a big +1.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-11-28 18:33:54|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard
server certificates to the new|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-11-28 18:00:39|
|Subject: Re: Review: Hot standby|