| From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Postgres Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks |
| Date: | 2008-11-26 20:59:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10811261259w339e04b8ib895e8caca990add@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Well, the *first* sentence there says it "resets the session to its
> initial state", so it seems to me the intent is clear. But maybe we
> should alter the second sentence to read, say, "This _currently_ has the
> same effect as ...", thereby making it clear that this is implementation
> detail and not the controlling definition.
+1.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-11-26 21:35:23 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-11-26 20:45:52 | Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks |