Re: Quality and Performance

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quality and Performance
Date: 2007-11-27 23:39:13
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10711271539u47266c87ge082d07511a26cdd@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Nov 27, 2007 11:45 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> If you start with a set of tests and send it to me I will start work on
> a benchmarking step in the buildfarm client.

Are you sure it shouldn't be a separate client? I don't think neither
the prerequisites nor the results wanted have something in common with
the build farm.

Another idea is that we should find a way to let people run their
specific benchmarks and use the client to report their results. Some
people may want to run read only benchmarks, some I/O heavy
benchmarks, and others benchmarks which runs for more than a day.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-11-27 23:45:26 Re: Quality and Performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-27 23:20:16 Re: Still a NOTICE in dict_thesaurus.c