Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: like/ilike improvements

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: like/ilike improvements
Date: 2007-05-22 17:38:48
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10705221038k498a6ccfn3533262cfdcb5ba7@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On 5/22/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> But before I commit this I'd appreciate seeing some more testing, both
> for correctness and performance.

Any chance the patch applies cleanly on a 8.2 code base? I can test it
on a real life 8.2 db but I won't have the time to load the data in a
CVS HEAD one.
If there is no obvious reason for it to fail on 8.2, I'll try to see
if I can apply it.

Thanks.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew - SupernewsDate: 2007-05-22 17:40:36
Subject: Re: like/ilike improvements
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-05-22 17:29:23
Subject: Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew - SupernewsDate: 2007-05-22 17:40:36
Subject: Re: like/ilike improvements
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-05-22 17:15:00
Subject: Re: Synchronized Scan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group