| From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: like/ilike improvements |
| Date: | 2007-05-22 17:38:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10705221038k498a6ccfn3533262cfdcb5ba7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 5/22/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> But before I commit this I'd appreciate seeing some more testing, both
> for correctness and performance.
Any chance the patch applies cleanly on a 8.2 code base? I can test it
on a real life 8.2 db but I won't have the time to load the data in a
CVS HEAD one.
If there is no obvious reason for it to fail on 8.2, I'll try to see
if I can apply it.
Thanks.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2007-05-22 17:40:36 | Re: like/ilike improvements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-22 17:29:23 | Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2007-05-22 17:40:36 | Re: like/ilike improvements |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-22 17:15:00 | Re: Synchronized Scan |