Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: vacuum message

From: adey <adey11(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gourish Singbal <gourish(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de>,pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum message
Date: 2005-09-27 03:03:29
Message-ID: 1c66bda805092620032b9af8c6@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
That's only 1.8mb of RAM, so I can't see it being a problems if you have no
RAM shortage on your server.

On 9/27/05, Gourish Singbal <gourish(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>  Thats a good Idea.
>  My output after full vaccum is :-
>  INFO: free space map: 9 relations, 114736 pages stored; 76592 total pages
> needed
> DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 300000 pages = 1856 kB shared
> memory.
> VACUUM
>  I just have a Question:
> Is the allocate pages 300000 okey ?. OR do i need to decrease it to 100000
> ?
>  regards
> Gouirsh Singbal
>
>  On 9/23/05, Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > On 23.09.2005 08:01, Adrian Engelbrecht wrote:
> > > You need to increase your max_fsm_pages to at least 29584 pages to
> > > accommodate / monitor all free pages.
> >
> > Better set it to much more to have some room for future growth, 50000
> > maybe.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hannes Dorbath
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >
> > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Gourish Singbal

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Robert NgoDate: 2005-09-27 03:43:47
Subject: Re: postgresql cluster on SAN
Previous:From: Jeff FrostDate: 2005-09-27 02:58:05
Subject: slony logwatch filter?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group