Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4

From: decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Jignesh K(dot) Shah <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: 2009-03-14 15:06:08
Message-ID: 1E9C2E4B-4C0C-4343-B244-388DA2047870@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> Fair enough..  Well I am now appealing  to all  who has a fairly  
> decent sized hardware want to try it out  and see whether there are  
> "gains", "no-changes" or "regressions" based on your workload. Also  
> it will help if you report number of cpus when you respond back to  
> help collect feedback.


Do you have a self-contained test case? I have several boxes with 16- 
cores worth of Xeon with 96GB I could try it on (though you might not  
care about having "only" 16 cores :P)
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828



In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: decibelDate: 2009-03-14 15:22:38
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Previous:From: decibelDate: 2009-03-14 14:47:53
Subject: Re: Query performance over a large proportion of data

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group