Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding?

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding?
Date: 2009-04-23 19:32:16
Message-ID: 1E3D7121-486A-4A13-B9B6-8E971DA78FF2@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Apr 23, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> You can get around this by cloning template0 instead of template1
> (we assume template0 contains nothing that's encoding-specific).
> Possibly the docs will need to be improved to emphasize that.

I was just about to suggest that. With this change, template0 is
suddenly going to be a lot more important for people to know about and
make use of.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-04-23 20:16:46 Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-04-23 19:27:05 Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding?