Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hakan Kocaman <hkocam(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Date: 2010-10-04 17:38:33
Message-ID: 1D0057B0-7151-425C-8096-56836F9AB4BD@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance


On Oct 4, 2010, at 13:13 , Robert Haas wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Hakan Kocaman <hkocam(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
>> for whom it may concern:
>> http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/mosbench/
>> They tested with 8.3.9, i wonder what results 9.0 would give.
>> Best regards and keep up the good work
>> Hakan
>
> Here's the most relevant bit to us:

<snip/>

> The use of lock-free
> techniques seems quite interesting; unfortunately, I know next to
> nothing about the topic and this paper doesn't provide much of an
> introduction. Anyone have a reference to a good introductory paper on
> the topic?

The README in the postgres section of the git repo leads me to think the code that includes the fixes it there, if someone wants to look into it (wrt to the Postgres lock manager changes). Didn't check the licensing.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-04 17:47:48 Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-04 17:32:34 Re: Additional index entries and table sorting

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-04 17:47:48 Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-04 17:13:36 Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance