RE: [INTERFACES] SSL and ODBC

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] SSL and ODBC
Date: 1999-10-01 07:25:27
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F748C0EF@S-NATH-EXCH2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

So how difficult would it be to include the SSL stuff in the ODBC drivers.

MikeA

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu]
>> Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 4:50 AM
>> To: Ansley, Michael
>> Cc: 'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'
>> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] SSL and ODBC
>>
>>
>> > I presume that the ODBC driver uses libpq underneath
>> (either statically or
>> > dynamically loaded) to talk to the server.
>>
>> Actually, no! libpq requires a cygwin environment, and
>> (perhaps) there
>> was a worry about performance (though that doesn't seem to
>> be an issue
>> to me). So the ODBC driver is completely standalone. The downside is
>> that it requires separate maintenance, and I'm pretty sure that there
>> are some arcane issues which don't get fixed there when they
>> change in
>> libpq...
>>
>> - Thomas
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Lockhart
>> lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
>> South Pasadena, California
>>
>> ************
>>

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 1999-10-01 07:58:35 RE: [INTERFACES] SSL and ODBC
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-01 02:50:05 Re: [INTERFACES] SSL and ODBC