RE: [INTERFACES] Late mail

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Late mail
Date: 1999-07-27 15:34:11
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F70ED097@S-NATH-EXCH2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Yes, I tracked it down to smtp2.a2000.nl. So they are duplicates? I
thought that they were originals, that I was receiving late. OK, fine, at
least I didn't miss the conversation.

Thanks, Tom

MikeA

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 1999 4:35 PM
>> To: Ansley, Michael
>> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Late mail
>>
>>
>> See "Mail loop" thread ... they're being regurgitated by a broken
>> mailserver in .nl someplace...
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-07-27 15:39:46 Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE performance degradation (6.5.1)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-27 15:12:10 Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan davis 1999-07-27 15:46:28 Re: [INTERFACES] libpq problem
Previous Message Herouth Maoz 1999-07-27 14:36:09 Re: [INTERFACES] How can I work thru this key problem?