Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [INTERFACES] 8K query limit in 6.5?

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] 8K query limit in 6.5?
Date: 1999-07-13 15:11:15
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F70ED026@S-NATH-EXCH2 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Why are these limits even an issue?  Surely I should be able to adjust
certain constants in the code (and this would include constants to take care
of the tuple length) in order to adjust the performance of the system.  I
realise that life is not that simple, but perhaps it could be made simpler
than it is now.  At the moment, some of the constants used are pretty
useless, because they can't really be adjusted.
Can't we come up with a way to make this more amenable to adjustment?

Thoughts...

MikeA

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 1999 3:59 PM
>> To: Matthew Hagerty
>> Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] 8K query limit in 6.5? 
>> 
>> 
>> Matthew Hagerty <matthew(at)venux(dot)net> writes:
>> > Was the 8K query limit increased in 6.5?
>> 
>> Nope.
>> 
>> I tried to stir up some enthusiasm for fixing it in 6.6, but didn't
>> have much success --- too soon to say whether it will happen for 6.6
>> or be postponed again.
>> 
>> 			regards, tom lane
>> 

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Daren SefcikDate: 1999-07-13 15:23:32
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Three posts and no response 8--(
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1999-07-13 13:59:04
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] 8K query limit in 6.5?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group