Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Ravindra Wankar'" <rwankar(at)iname(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: JDBC 2.0 support and reliability
Date: 2000-12-18 09:37:02
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B66A@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
 
 

-- 
Peter Mount 
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council 
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk 
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk <http://www.maidstone.gov.uk/>  
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravindra Wankar [mailto:rwankar(at)iname(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:09 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] JDBC 2.0 support and reliability


 
Can anyone share experiences using the latest Postgresql JDBC driver? What
I'm specifically looking for is
 
1. Is it JDBC 2.0 compliant?
[Peter Mount] Not fully, but getting there 
2. Are all interfaces implemented (If not is there a list of unimplemented
interfaces). I found that the getImportedKeys method is not implemented when
using TableGen to generate code that accesses the DB.
[Peter Mount] The interfaces are getting done one by one... 
3. Is it production quality?
[Peter Mount] Some people think so ;-) From release to release it's getting
better. 
 
Thanks,
-- Ravi.

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Peter MountDate: 2000-12-18 09:46:42
Subject: RE: Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help...
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2000-12-18 08:15:50
Subject: RE:

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group