Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: jdbc Bug ?

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Ramiro Diaz Trepat'" <ramiro(at)opetra(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: jdbc Bug ?
Date: 2000-09-14 12:36:05
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B3DC@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Added to my ever growing list ;-)
 
Peter

-- 
Peter Mount 
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council 
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk 
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk <http://www.maidstone.gov.uk/>  
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ramiro Diaz Trepat [mailto:ramiro(at)opetra(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 1:32 AM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] jdbc Bug ?


Hello, 
   I started using Postgres with a java framework that a company sold to us.

   We discovered that the "execute" method always returns a ResultSet even 
when the statement was an insert or an update statement.  According to the 
documentation of the j2se, when the statement is an insert or an update, 
the "execute" method should return null. 
   Was this known ?  How can one checkout the sources and contribute ? 
-- 

Ramiro Diaz Trepat

Director de Tecnologia

Operaciones Transparentes
  

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-09-14 15:05:25
Subject: Re: UnixODBC/Postgres & Excel...
Previous:From: Peter MountDate: 2000-09-14 08:50:48
Subject: RE: bug in JDBC UNICODE support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group