RE: JDBC2 support

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Rachel Greenham'" <rachel(dot)greenham(at)enetgroup(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: RE: JDBC2 support
Date: 2000-08-14 06:45:29
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B247@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Yes, although it is dependent on when I get enough time to sit down and work
on it (MBC are taking their toll at the moment).

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council

-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel Greenham [mailto:rachel(dot)greenham(at)enetgroup(dot)co(dot)uk]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 3:17 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] JDBC2 support

I noticed, on investigating the failure of any of my code to work, that most
if not all of the new methods in JDBC2 have not actually been implemented in
the JDBC2 driver (postgres 7.0.2). They just throw NotImplemented
exceptions.

Any plans to implement them? :-)

--
Rachel

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-08-14 06:48:51 RE: Using jdbc with JBuilder 3.5
Previous Message Joachim Achtzehnter 2000-08-13 19:58:49 Re: Large objects with JDBC