The SQL7 way is the schema is the username, with the exception of "dba" -
it's used as a "global" schema.
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council
From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 9:22 AM
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Subject: RE: AW: [HACKERS] Big 7.1 open items
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org]On
> Behalf Of Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> > > > AFAIK,schema is independent from user in SQL92.
> > > > So default_tablespace_per_user doesn't necessarily imply
> > > > default_tablespace_per_schema.
> > >
> > > Well, sombody must be interpreting this wrong, because
> > > in Informix and Oracle the schema corresponds to the owner
> > > and they say they conform to ansi in this regard.
> > Is there really a schema:user=1:1 limitation in SQL-92 ?
> > Though both SQL-86 and SQL-89 had the limitation
> > SQL-92 removed it AFAIK.
> As I said in another posting a user does not need to exist
> for each schema. The dba can create objects under any
> schema name.
Sorry for my poor understanding.
What I meant was that SQL92 allows the following.
Is my understaning same as yours ?
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Karel Zak||Date: 2000-06-29 09:39:07|
|Subject: Re: Misc. consequences of backend memory management changes |
|Previous:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2000-06-29 08:21:57|
|Subject: RE: AW: Big 7.1 open items|