Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Mount (Home)" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: RE: RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: 2000-05-03 15:59:39
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C573@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Ok, I've just committed some fixes.

The README should now say things about 7.0, the org.postgresql change,
and the proper build instructions.

make jdbc1 & make jdbc2 now force the postgresql.jar to be rebuilt.

I've fixed a couple of problems with the examples. Mainly, the
threadsafe test wouldn't run here. It seems that on this machine thread2
overtook thread1, and things got messy.

Bruce, do you want an extra rule added for kaffe? I could add it, but I
currently have no way of testing it.

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Mount [mailto:petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 2:39 PM
To: 'Bruce Momjian'; Peter Mount
Cc: 'Thomas Lockhart'; Tom Lane; Lamar Owen; PostgreSQL-development;
PostgreSQL-interfaces; Peter Mount (Home)
Subject: [INTERFACES] RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status


Hmmm, I could add a rule just for Kaffe that does include all of them.
I'd prefer keeping the existing rule for most cases (as it prevents
every file being compiled every time), but it should only be 3 lines...

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 2:13 PM
To: Peter Mount
Cc: 'Thomas Lockhart'; Tom Lane; Lamar Owen; PostgreSQL-development;
PostgreSQL-interfaces; Peter Mount (Home)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status


> PM: I'm actually sneeking one day time here (shouldn't but will) so
> things should be better by the end of today. I'm about to get a JDK
> installed under NT, just to give an extra platform to test under.

I talked to the Kaffe folks and compiling mutually dependent java files
must be done by compiling them all at the same time:

	java a.java b.java

Seems it is a kaffe limitation/bug.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-05-03 16:15:04
Subject: Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-05-03 15:51:27
Subject: Re: Why Not MySQL?

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-05-03 16:15:04
Subject: Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-05-03 15:43:39
Subject: Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group