Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [INTERFACES] invalid lo descriptorc in begin commit fraze

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl'" <M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] invalid lo descriptorc in begin commit fraze
Date: 2000-02-17 09:21:42
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C210@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Hmmm, as these are on separate connections, it sounds like its the
backend having problems, not JDBC.

Sorry, I seem to have missed part of the thread amist the chaos here at
work :-(

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.



-----Original Message-----
From: M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl [mailto:M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 9:12 AM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] invalid lo descriptorc in begin commit fraze 


On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> I got the impression that what he was talking about was multiple
> independent threads issuing commands across a single backend
connection.
NO, evry servlet starts his own connection. Is not to be very occupied
site, so I allowed my self for such a simplicity:).
It's enough to have three starting servlets, and lo_read error is
generated.
mazek


Marcin Mazurek

-- 
administrator
MULTINET SA o/Poznan
http://www.multinet.pl/


************

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Chris HolmanDate: 2000-02-17 12:21:47
Subject: link problems when inheriting from libpq++
Previous:From: M.MazurekDate: 2000-02-17 09:11:55
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] invalid lo descriptorc in begin commit fraze

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group