RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votest

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: vadim(at)krs(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votest
Date: 1999-12-24 09:32:45
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C00B@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Java's ok with them removed from 1 line statements, but perl requires
the brackets.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Friday, December 24, 1999 3:55 AM
To: D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Cc: vadim(at)krs(dot)ru; pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votest

> Me for next line too. It just seems so easy to see the blocks when
the
> brackets line up _and_ are on a line by themselves.

I agree, but many don't, hence the vote.

>
> Was there a vote for brackets around 1 line statements? If so I vote
no.

No one has mentioned that, and I have removed most of them.

>
> > CC'ed to hackers list for all to see, so they don't think I am
making
> > this up.
>
> No one would ever believe that of you, Bruce.

I want to make sure the voting remains unbiased, even though I am
tallying the votes.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026

************

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 1999-12-24 09:52:37 Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes
Previous Message Peter Mount 1999-12-24 09:31:21 RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes