| From: | Tom Allison <tom(at)tacocat(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debian problem... |
| Date: | 2007-09-28 09:09:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1A21A49B-2F09-4A01-A27C-95085BCC8276@tacocat.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sep 12, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Tom Allison schrieb:
>> On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Tom Allison wrote:
>>>
>>> I was able get my database working again.
>>> Never figured out why...
>> My database data (sorry about the redundancy there) is sitting on
>> a RAID1 array with LVM and ReiserFS.
>> I've heard some dissention about the use of ReiserFS and was
>> wondering:
>
> No problem with RazorFS if your hardware does not fail. But if...
> chances are you have to use your backup.
>
> Alternatively you could use XFS but I'm not sure if it performs
> better on failing hardware. I guess not.
>
> Regards
> Tino
Well, when one is looking at hardware failure, the performance
doesn't really matter that much.
Is EXT3 better for dealing with a RAID1 failure?
I know reiserfs does better performance wise, but there's no point in
going fast if you can't steer.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nis Jørgensen | 2007-09-28 09:17:17 | Re: Normalized Tables & SELECT [was: Find "smallest common year"] |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2007-09-28 09:04:01 | Re: Normalized Tables & SELECT [was: Find "smallest common year"] |