Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, Frank Cusack <fcusack(at)iconnet(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Date: 1999-12-16 01:42:32
Message-ID: 199912160142.UAA11925@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
Never mind.  Patch is fir mac, not inet.

> Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> writes:
> > Yes, I reproduced this (Solaris 2.5/sparc). 
> > Seems like CIDR problem(??!):
> 
> Yes.  Looks like the low-order bits of a CIDR address are garbage,
> but network_cmp() compares them as though all bits are significant.
> So, indeed, it may think two different instances of '1.2.3/24'
> are not equal.
> 
> The regular inet comparison functions at least *try* to mask out
> garbage bits, but I think they get it wrong too --- they should be
> taking the smaller of ip_bits(a1) and ip_bits(a2) as the number of
> bits to compare.  They don't.  Thus, for example,
> 
> regression=> select '1.2.5/16'::cidr < '1.2.3/24'::cidr;
> ?column?
> --------
> f
> (1 row)
> 
> which looks wrong to me.
> 
> In short, it's a bug in the inet data types, not a generic problem
> with unique indexes.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ************
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-12-16 01:43:11
Subject: Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-12-16 01:29:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-12-16 01:43:11
Subject: Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-12-16 01:29:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group