Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re:

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re:
Date: 1999-11-29 05:45:47
Message-ID: 19991129144547J.t-ishii@sra.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Is there a reason it is called pg_ctl and not pg_control?  I find I
> abbreviate control as ctrl, cntrl, cntl so I usually spell it out.

I just got the idea from "apachectl" or a famous system call "ioctl." 
However, if it's not natural for English speakers, I'm glad to change
it to more appropriate one.
--
Tatsuo Ishii


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 1999-11-29 05:59:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1999-11-29 05:41:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group