From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd) |
Date: | 1999-11-18 22:28:41 |
Message-ID: | 199911182228.RAA15750@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't see the same __arm32_ defines I have in 7.0 tree.
> > >
> > > You don't see them in REL6_5_PATCHES, you mean? So, you only applied
> > > them to CURRENT?
> >
> > Yes, only current. I suspect the original patch was too risky for the
> > stable tree.
>
> Ok; I am shipping those patches with the 6.5.3 RPM's. There are not
> major changes made by them -- just minor defines, the linux_arm
> template, etc. Do you want to re-review them for inclusion in
> REL6_5_PATCHES, or just wait?? They're only 2K.
We never seem to understand all the affects patches have, especially
when they affect s_lock.c or s_lock.h. Don'tthink they should appear
in 6.5.*. We can make a separate patch for ARM and put it in the
patches directory like we did for Alpha.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-18 22:31:51 | Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd) |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 1999-11-18 22:22:48 | Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd) |