Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PORTS] Status of Linux/Strongarm?

From: Ted Nolan SRI Augusta GA <ted(at)ags(dot)ga(dot)erg(dot)sri(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Status of Linux/Strongarm?
Date: 1999-11-04 18:39:40
Message-ID: 199911041834.NAA06169@ags.ga.erg.sri.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
In message <3821B183(dot)3F9A9C5B(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>you write:
>> The only mention of the strongarm processor that I can find on the
>> lists is a test-and-set patch this last March for Postgres on
>> Netbsd/Strongarm.  The patch seems to have made it into 6.5.1, so I
>> assume NetBsd/Strongarm is now "supported".  How about
>> Linux/Strongarm?  Has anyone built on that yet?  Any problems?  (I'd just
>> try it, but we don't have the strongarm systems yet..)
>
>Let me know what you find out. I don't show netbsd/strongarm as
>supported, but maybe I missed a report on the mailing list...
>
>                      - Thomas
>
>-- 
>Thomas Lockhart				lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
>South Pasadena, California

Well,

I found a netwinder site at netwinder.org, and they have RPMs for 6.5.1,
so my guess is that they believe it works on Redhat/Strongarm...


http://www.netwinder.org/allrpms.html




				Ted

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Iwan FaberDate: 1999-11-04 18:44:15
Subject: Fw: Installed!
Previous:From: Aaron HeldDate: 1999-11-04 18:25:09
Subject: Successful install

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group