Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Date: 1999-10-26 16:46:54
Message-ID: 199910261646.MAA26631@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Sounds good.  My only question is whether people need backward
> > compatibility, and whether we can remove the compatiblity part of the
> > interface and small overhead after 7.1 or later?
> 
> I think we could drop it after a decent interval, but I don't see any
> reason to be in a hurry.  I do think that we'll get complaints if 7.0
> doesn't have any backward compatibility for existing user functions.

True.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-10-26 16:49:57
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 1999-10-26 16:43:15
Subject: psql Week 4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group