Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)wizard(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2
Date: 1999-09-27 20:54:12
Message-ID: 199909272054.QAA16830@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)wizard(dot)net> writes:
> > May I ask that the patches I submitted two months ago for 6.5.0 are applied
> > at least to 6.5.2?
> > Here is the 6.5.1 version of my patches.
> 
> I don't much care for QueryLimit (we got rid of that for a reason!)
> nor for the FREE_TUPLE_MEMORY patch, but the rest of this looks safe
> enough... but are we in the business of adding features to 6.5.*,
> even little ones?  Maybe it should only go in current.

Applied to 6.6 only, without tuple memory or query limit fix.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-09-27 21:02:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Lexer again.
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-09-27 20:49:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group