Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Heinecke <dheinecke(at)axent(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?
Date: 1999-09-27 17:25:32
Message-ID: 199909271725.NAA03991@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Yeah,
>
> That is pretty much the short of it. My greatest concern undertaking an
> effort like this is the resultant #ifdef/#else/#endif mess that I will need
> to make of the code. We do a lot of cross-platform development here and
> ultimately the code begins to look very ugly to anything except a
> preprocessor. The alternative is to put most of the nt-specific code in
> separate files, but then we would have to merge over the newer code from the
> CVS repository. It is not a job that I look forward to, but our unix
> customers are clamoring for PostGRE on the backend and our non-unix
> customers are not going to be satisfied with MySQL. Sucks to be me, I
> guess.

But why re-invent all the work CygWin does? Why not use something that
is modular, tested, and free?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ted Nolan SRI Augusta GA 1999-09-27 17:30:08 Re: [PORTS] ipc-daemon runs wild on NT?
Previous Message Ted Nolan SRI Augusta GA 1999-09-27 17:21:31 Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?