From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> |
Cc: | "'Michael Meskes'" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] ecpg and getting just assigned serial number |
Date: | 1999-09-15 08:37:24 |
Message-ID: | 19990915103724.B1050@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 09:50:52AM +0200, Ansley, Michael wrote:
> I don't think that a sequence number should be going into sqlca. This is
> what it sounds like you are going to do, yes?
But this wasn't what I meant. :-)
I wasn't wording very well. What I wanted to say was that I don't see much
of a chance to give back the serial as such. What I added to my TODO list
(and btw just committed the changed source) is the return of the OID for the
singleton insert.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De | Use PostgreSQL!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Margarita Barvinok | 1999-09-15 13:02:29 | Re: [INTERFACES] Transaction: Begin, Lock |
Previous Message | Ansley, Michael | 1999-09-15 07:50:52 | RE: [INTERFACES] ecpg and getting just assigned serial number |