From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Margarita Barvinok <brita(at)umich(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Transaction: Begin, Lock |
Date: | 1999-09-14 18:22:15 |
Message-ID: | 19990914202215.A5414@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:58:43AM -0400, Margarita Barvinok wrote:
> EXEC SQL CONNECT TO ...
> for (i=2; i<x: i++) {
> strncpy(oid_c, entries[i].val, 10); /* get oid */
> oid_rec = atoi(oid_c);
> EXEC SQL BEGIN WORK;
> EXEC SQL DELETE FROM phonebook
> WHERE oid = :oid_rec;
> EXEC SQL COMMIT WORK;
> }
> EXEC SQL DISCONNECT;
>
> 1. Why i get the following message when I run this code?
> NOTICE: BeginTransactionBlock and not in default state
I take it you did not use 'ecpg -t' did you? The normal situation is that
ecpg creates a auto-transaction mode, i.e. a transaction is started
automatically. You only need to issue a COMMIT once you finish your
transaction resp. a ROLLBACK if you want to cancel it.
So you tell the backend to start a transaction while already inside a
transaction. And that cannot work.
You can either just remove the BEGIN WORK statement or you always give
option '-t' to ecpg.
> 2. How should I lock the table phonebook during this transaction?
Why do you need that? You do not need an explicit lock for the delete to
work.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De | Use PostgreSQL!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 1999-09-14 18:23:04 | Re: [INTERFACES] ecpg and getting just assigned serial number |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 1999-09-14 17:33:16 | Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and getting just assigned serial number |